|
Landowners should let out property to carriers strictly on their terms. If not,soccer uniform, they may invite trouble later. This is because carriers often try to take advantage of the loop holes in the agreement. Let’s take the instance of California based farmer Steve Jones. Steve let out a portion of his land to a cell carrier company and took a loan to buy a farm house. One fine day, the carrier sent a notice to Steve,nfl draft 2011 mock, stating that the tower on his property is no longer viable for the company. They terminated the contract unilaterally, leaving Steve neck deep in trouble. Carriers often insist on the right to terminate the lease unilaterally. This is a primary condition imposed by the companies on land owners. Most land owners, like Steve accept this because they believe, as long as money comes,nba 10, it is an added bonus. They never think of the consequences of an early termination before they are hit by it. The lure of easy money combined with the threat of moving over to another property over any minor disagreement,2010 nfl rankings, like this, works well for cell tower companies. To browbeat companies,nfl official, a landowner should insist on early termination penalties. This will lessen the impact of the blow caused by the unilateral termination of the lease. The advantage of such a term is that it would make cell tower companies think twice before carrying out a unilateral decision. The lease should also include the “use it or lose it” provisions. This will enable the property owner to annul the lease if the carrier makes no use of the portion for years on end. Both these provisions i.e. penalty for early termination and use it or lose it clause can save a landlord from many arm twisting. |